DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2012-075
NAME
RE4
RELIEF REQUESTED | Honorable; Change Narrative Reason
RELIEF GRANTED None
BY DRB
ADMIN None
CORRECTIONS
TIS 1 yrs, 5 months, 1 days
Policy Implications _ | None
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to involvement with drugs. During a CGIS investigation, the
applicant admitted to using the controlled substance Analog Spice on at least one occasion in 2011. Thereafter
in the Spring of 2012, the command initiated action pursuant to policy to discharge the applicant.
The applicant was given the opportunity to seek an attorney, submit a statement, while also objecting to the
Discharge. One month later, the applicant’s separation package was approved and the Discharge was effective.
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant offered no new evidence on his
behalf to refute the findings of the discharge. Prior to the applicant’s drug use in 2011, ALCOAST 605/10 was
in place to specifically list Spice as an illegal drug, and usage of said substance would result in a Discharge
from the service.
Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for
individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The Coast Guard has zero tolerance
for drug abuse. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.
Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 046
Per ALCOAST 605/10, the use of spice was specified as illegal for all Coast Guard members. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 012
The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident. Pursuant to policy, the applicant was processed for Discharge separation due to a drug incident. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 081
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 027
Pursuant to policy, the applicant he was recommended for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 004
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Involvement with drugs in 2011. The applicant admitted to the Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS) in the Fall of 2010 to using marijuana on different occasions. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 089
The Board finds no issues with propriety in this case. The applicant has not provided any evidence to support a request for an upgrade based upon the equity standard. The Board recommends no relief.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 011
Pursuant to policy, the applicant was processed for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 071
The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident. Pursuant to policy, he was recommended for Discharge due to the drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 088
During the interviews, three of the applicant’s co-workers admitted to drug use and stated that the applicant had used methamphetamines with them on six different occasions. Prior to NJP and Discharge, the applicant did admit to heavy drinking, but has no other derogatory information in the service record. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 001
The applicant was found by Customs Border Protection in possession of a THC substance. Pursuant to policy, the applicant was recommended for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.